Legal Opinion

Baldwin Bracelet Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 19, 1963No. 17701PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a petition to review and set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. The relevant facts are as follows:

Petitioner, Baldwin Bracelet Corporation, with headquarters and principal office in New York City, is engaged in the production and sale of expansion watchbands, for which Baldwin purchases the necessary metal in the United States and exports it to Hong Kong, where it is fabricated into bracelet linkages. Subsequently, an affiliate of Baldwin, Janaco Manufacturing Corporation of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands (not a party hereto), imports those…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MerskySupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. L. Heller & Son, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  2. American Cyanamid Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  3. American Cyanamid Company v. Federal Trade Commission, Bristol-Myers Company and Bristol Laboratories Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, the Upjohn Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. Brite Manufacturing Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. W. M. R. Watch Case Corporation, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API