Legal Opinion

Hernández v. Pérez Ortiz

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided November 5, 1935No. 7086Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wole

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal as frivolous. The appellee draws attention to the fact that the case was tried on the merits and evidence submitted, and yet the appellant has done nothing to incorporate the evidence taken at the trial. The action was one in filiation and the court found judgment in favor of the plaintiff. We may assume with the appellee that the facts tending to show that the plaintiff was *2duly acknowledged by her father were provéd at the trial, namely, that -the plaintiff’s father and mother were living together in the state of concubinage, were each capable of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bruns v. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Carter v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. In re the Estate of De ConzaEssex County Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API