Legal Opinion

Fardig v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 14, 1990No. A-2900, A-2901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

COATS, Judge.

Kristine M. Fardig, Dorothy M. Bas-sett, Diane M. Metcalf, and Carol I. Dvorak (hereinafter “Fardig”) pled no contest to trespass, Anchorage Municipal Code (AMC) 08.30.010(A), preserving the right to appeal the denial of their motions to dismiss. Cooksey v. State, 524 P.2d 1251 (Alaska 1974). We recently affirmed these convictions in Fardig v. Anchorage, 785 P.2d 911 (Alaska App.1990). In issuing our decision, we specifically declined to address the merits of Fardig’s contention that AMC 08.30.010 is overbroad because Fardig had not raised this argument below.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1996
  2. City of Helena v. KrautterMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Moorman v. DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API