Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Be-Jel Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dobs, J,

The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, The plaintiffs claim that these injuries occurred by reason of the negligence of the defendant in maintaining a grating in the sidewalk adjoining defendant’s premises in violation of section 242 of article 17 of chapter 23 of the Code of Ordinances of the city of New York, which reads as follows:

“ No person shall remove or insecurely fix, or cause, procure, suffer, or permit to be removed or to be insecurely fixed, so that the same can be moved in its bed, any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Swift v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Olsen v. Fennia Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuevas v. 73rd & Central Park West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Bauman v. Be-Jel Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API