Legal Opinion
Young v. Shore
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 1, 2008No. Civil Action 05-822-JJFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are three motions: (1) a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 45) filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Barbara Young; (2) a Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 46) filed by Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Catherine Shore; and (3) a Motion To Strike (D.I. 52) filed by Plaintiff Kathryn Vitale. For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant both of the Motions For Summary Judgment and will deny the Motion To Strike.
I. BACKGROUND
Barbara Young (“Young”) and her daughter, Kathryn Vitale (“Vitale”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. Playtex FP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alcantara v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014