Legal Opinion

Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1888PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Union County.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

It appears from the bill of exceptions herein, that the respondents were contractors and builders, engaged in furnishing and putting up what is known as the “ roller process” for manufacturing flour. The appellants had a flouring mill at Island City, Union County, Oregon, and were engaged in operating it. The mill was the old style “burr process,” was run by water-power, the water being conducted in a ditch to the mill from the Grand Ronde River.

The respondents about the last of May or 1st of June, 1886, visited the appellants at their mill, and after examining it and the water-power by which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Giffert v. WestWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ladd v. Lord & GillettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
  5. Edwards v. CollsonNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. O. C. Gove & Co. v. Island City Mercantile & Milling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lenz v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Edmunds v. WellingOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Farmers' National Bank v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API