Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Pizzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988Published

1Dissent

Boomer and Balio, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. The trial court did not err by refusing to suppress physical evidence taken from defendant’s vehicle following an inventory search. The police were justified in approaching defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of seeking information (People v Brown, 116 AD2d 727). When defendant, who was sitting in the driver’s seat, failed to produce a driver’s license, further detention was warranted while police checked to determine whether he was a licensed operator (People v Brown, supra; see also, People v Stith, 124 AD2d 342, mod on other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. StithNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. CruzNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. McLaurinNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API