Tahmina Proulx v. 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, LLC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Ruiz, Senior Judge:
*670 Tahmina Proulx appeals the trial court's determination that she is liable for breach of a contract for commercial property that was sold to her by appellee 1400 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE, LLC. Appellant argues that the court erred in (1) finding that the contract was not a contract of adhesion, and (2) concluding that the liquidated damages provision was valid. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I
In February of 2012, Remy Esquenet, an attorney and real estate broker representing appellee, and Ken Noroozi, a real estate broker representing appellant, began negotiations…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vicki Bagley Realty, Inc. v. LauferDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- MAIA FALCONI-SACHS v. LPF SENATE SQUARE, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Apprio, Inc. v. ZaccariDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Cummings Properties, LLC v. HinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
- Gambo v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Hilgartner v. YagiDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Hirecounsel Dc, LLC v. ConnollyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.