Legal Opinion

In re the Guardianship of the Person & Property of Kustka

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edwin Kassoff, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 81 of the Mental *696Hygiene Law, seeking the appointment of a guardian for the property management and personal needs of the alleged incapacitated person, James Kustka. The petitioner is the granddaughter of the alleged incapacitated person.

The evidence adduced at the hearing revealed that 81-year-old James Kustka resided in Woodside, New York with his wife of 50 years until she passed away on June 9, 1994. Some three months later, in September 1994, James Kustka married Anna Vidovenyczova (Anna), a live-in home-care…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WeismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Murphy v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re NebrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. 55th Management Corp. v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re Karen P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re DiCeccoNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re of ClaimanNew York Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API