Legal Opinion
HAAGENSEN v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided June 10, 2011No. 06-10-00198-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice MOSELEY.
Samuel Coy Haagensen appeals his conviction by a jury for delivery of less than one gram of methamphetamine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.102, 481.112 (Vernon 2010). After obtaining a search warrant for Haagensen’s residence, Officer Leigh Foreman was contacted by a confidential informant who advised he could make a methamphetamine purchase from Haagensen. Based on this offer, the police officers decided to wait before executing the search warrant. Prior to the purchase, Foreman searched the confidential informant and provided him with money to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lionell Dewayne West v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Ex Parte Patricia Foster Skelton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- James Earl Lemons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- Christopher Anthony White v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
- Dennis Stephen McCardle A/K/A Dennis Steve McCardle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.