Legal Opinion · Dissent
Witherspoon v. White
California Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1911No. Sac. No. 1671Published
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. White & Miller, Richards & Carrier, and Devlin & Devlin, for Appellants. Wm. M. Sims, R. C. Van Fleet, Snook & Church, Mastick & Partridge, and W. B. Treadwell, for Respondent.
1DissentAngellotti, J.
This appeal was first decided in the district court of appeal for the third appellate district, where judgment was rendered affirming the order appealed from. Accompanying the judgment was the following opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Burnett:—
“This is an appeal from a decree of partial distribution to one Earl D. White of the estate of Andrew Carothers, deceased.
“Andrew Carothers died on or about the 13th day of December, 1876, and on January 8, 1877, his will was admitted to probate and his son, William P. Carothers, was appointed executor of the estate. By his last will and testament said…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fowler v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Britton v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Fowler v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Mackay v. MackayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.