Legal Opinion

Spy Optic, Inc. v. Alibaba.com, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 28, 2015No. Case No. CV 15-00659-BRO (JCx)PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS [31]

BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Defendant Alibaba.com Hong Kong Ltd.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings against Plaintiff Spy Optic, Inc. (“Plaintiff’). (Dkt. No. 31.) Defendant seeks to dismiss all claims in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). In the FAC, Plaintiff alleges five causes of action: (1) direct and contributory trademark infringement and counterfeiting, under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114(1), 1116(d), and 1117(b) and (c); (2) false…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Veridian Credit Union v. Eddie Bauer, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  2. Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. Technopark Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  3. Kaseberg v. Conaco, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
  4. Amazon.com, Inc. v. Sleja, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Bestway Inflatables & Material Corp. v. DoeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API