Legal Opinion

Horn v. Raines

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 14, 2005No. Civ.A. Nos. 04-1783(RJL), 04-1827(RJL), 04-1852(RJL), 04-1960(RJL), 04-2084(RJL), 04-2228(RJL)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEON, District Judge.

There are seven stockholder derivative actions that have been filed by individual and institutional plaintiffs in this Court.1 Currently pending before the Court are various parties’ motions to consolidate the actions and for appointment of a leadership structure. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the parties’ motions to consolidate, appoints Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust (“Pirelli”) and Wayne County Employees’ Retirement System (“Wayne County”) as Co-Lead Plaintiffs, and approves Barrett, Johnston…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. MacAlister v. GutermaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Resnik v. WoertzDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  2. In Re Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n SecuritiesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. KBC Asset Management NV ex rel. Chemed Corp. v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  4. Federal Housing Finance Agency v. RainesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Federal Housing Finance Agency v. MarronDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API