Legal Opinion

Maley v. East Side Bank of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 19, 1964No. 63 C 1508PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBSON, District Judge.

The trustee in bankruptcy of the National Lumber Company has moved for summary judgment against the East Side Bank of Chicago, which motion is opposed on the ground that genuine issues of fact exist which preclude the granting of the motion.

An oral memorandum opinion announced December 17, 1963, on the motion to dismiss, sets forth many of the facts involved in this controversy.

The court concludes that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment should be granted in that there is no seriously contested issue of any material fact, but simply of the legal consequences…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Kearney Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Miller v. First Granite City National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  4. Feldman v. Capitol Piece Dye Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. Kerner v. KinseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bank of Southeast v. KoslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Maley v. East Side Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. Duvoisin v. Kennerly, Montgomery, Howard & Finley (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
  4. Long v. WatkinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1967
  5. McNeill v. SidemanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API