Legal Opinion

Pio v. Ross B. Hammond Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1978No. TC 408-020, SC 25050PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Defendant, a general construction contractor, is a party to a master labor agreement negotiated between councils of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and several associations of general contractors in Oregon and Southwest Washington. The master agreement contains a clause governing the subcontracting of work covered by the agreement to subcontractors who are not themselves signatories to the agreement. It provides that a general contractor either must require such a subcontractor to bind himself to the terms of the master agreement or the contractor must assume…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Local Union No. 189, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Jewel Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brewer v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API