Legal Opinion

Eager v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 20, 2002No. 01 C 3159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BUCKLO, District Judge.

Karen Eager was hired by Common- • wealth Edison and its parent Excelon (collectively “ComEd”) as a meter reader in 1990, but since September 1991, she worked as an electrical lineman in ComEd’s Overhead Department at its University Park facility in Kankakee, Illinois. Her job involved climbing poles and doing overhead electric work. She was one of two women among the non-supervisory employees at the University Park facility. She says that she was subject to sexual harassment and retaliation from 1993 to 1999, when she took a disability leave…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malozienc v. Pacific Rail ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. Berg v. BCS Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. White v. ADDANTEDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Lawton v. Weil Foot and Ankle Institute, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API