Legal Opinion

Salicos v. Louisiana State Racing Commission

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1986No. CA-3709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Judge.

A racehorse trainer complains that the Louisiana State Racing Commission imposes disproportionate sanctions for the same violations.

A horse trained by George Sálicos finished fourth at Delta Downs Race Track. A post-race analysis and a split sample of the horse’s urine was positive for prohibited stimulants. The Commission suspended Sálicos’ license for two years, imposed a $500 fine, and the trial court affirmed.

Sálicos’ sole issue asks whether trainers have the right to equal penalties for the same violation. He contends the court erred by not remanding for additional evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Briley v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Loftin v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Duhon v. Louisiana State Racing CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Cox v. Louisiana Department of Agriculture & ForestryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Faye Ellis v. Anderson Tully CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API