Legal Opinion

Burbell v. Burman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.

Motion to direct defendant to appear for examination before trial, and in the event he fails to appear as directed, to impose the penalties set forth in CPLR 3126, is granted as herein indicated.

The parties served cross notices of examination. Plaintiff’s examination was first taken and completed and it was agreed to hold defendant’s examination on an early adjourned date. More than a month has gone by. Plaintiff’s attorney has been given various excuses and explanations, but defendant has not been produced. Now, in response to this motion, trial counsel for defendant states that he needs…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Di Bartolo v. American & Foreign InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Nassau Trust Co. v. BelfieldCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  3. Fleming v. FlemingNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API