Hammond v. Cabaniss
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The bill is to foreclose a chattel mortgage in form of a deed of trust. Respondents claim through the mortgagor, relying upon title acquired subsequent to the execution and record of the mortgage. Demurrers challenge the sufficiency of the description of the property to charge third persons with constructive notice of the mortgage.
The granting and descriptive clause reads:
“In consideration of $10, cash in hand paid, I hereby convey and warrant to L. Hammond, trustee, the following described property in Hale county, Ala., to wit:
“27 head cows and heifers and Jersey bulls, 1 bay horse, named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ellis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Stickney v. Dunaway & LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Woods v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Varnum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Connally v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart v. ClemensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Liquid Carbonic Corp. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Abernathy v. WorthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Deloney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Dutton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.