Legal Opinion

Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 6, 1933No. Congressional No. 17636PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

On January 17, 1926, the plaintiff filed its petition in this court, H-22, wherein it sought to recover from the United States the sum of $391,278.63, with interest, for repairing and reconditioning certain vessels owned by the United States Shipping Board. Later, in April 1928, a bill was introduced in the Senate of the United States appropriating the sum of $590,468.82 to the plaintiff as reimbursement for repairing and reconditioning the vessels, the relief to plaintiff proposed in the Senate bill being identical to the relief sought in H-22. This bill was, by Senate Eesolution No. 241,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. New Bedford Dry Dock Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  3. Braun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Excavating Equipment Dealers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API