Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri Corporation v. American Refrigerator Transit Company, a New Jersey Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 19, 1964No. 7336_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal involves the construction of a contract under the substantive law of the State of Colorado. There are no decisions of the Supreme Court of that State directly in point. The court below, after looking at all the provisions of the contract, determined, under the weight of authorities generally, that appellant had a “duty to inspect”. This court has held that, in the absence of controlling state court authority, we will accept the federal trial judge’s interpretation of state law unless we are convinced that such interpretation is clearly erroneous. 1 We cannot say the trial court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. F & S Construction Company, an Arizona Corporation v. Emil Berube and Ellen BerubeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Robert Porter & Sons, Inc. v. National Distillers Products Company, a Division of National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  3. Conley v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation v. Henry H. Lembke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. Roy Kirby, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. United States of America, in the Matter of Allen Brothers Truck Lines, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API