Legal Opinion
Dietz v. Weisthal
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Defendant’s counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.
The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Poole v. MayerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985