Legal Opinion

Ganley v. Lamson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 16, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action to recover for the use by the defendant’s testatrix of furniture, belonging to the plaintiff, for a period of fifteen years ending with the death of the testatrix in March, 1929. The answer was a general denial, plea of payment and the statute of .limitations.

There was testimony tending to show a contract for the use of the furniture as alleged. The defendant, after the decease of his testatrix, asked the plaintiff to come and get her furniture, and the plaintiff did so. The only question is whether the defendant's motion for a directed verdict ought to have been granted.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gartland v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Cammisa v. FerreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API