Legal Opinion

Archer v. District of Columbia Dept. of Human Resources

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1977No. 9464Published

1Opinion of the Court

375 A.2d 523 (1977)

Louise ARCHER et al., Petitioners,

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, Respondent.

No. 9464.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued March 11, 1976.[*]

Decided July 6, 1977.

Gerald W. Von Korff, Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

S. Perry Jones, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., at the time the brief was filed, Louis P. Robbins, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before KERN, GALLAGHER and MACK,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D. C. Transit System, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Rothstein v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API