Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Harris Transfer Co.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

The facts and issues raised on this appeal are well stated in the dissenting opinion to which we refer the reader for an understanding thereof.

At the outset it should be noted that those who concur in' the majority opinion agree with the dissenting opinion to the extent that we hold that all the assignments of error are related and that arguing them together does not preclude *123consideration of one assignment, even though others may be without merit.

As to the merits, on this appeal, we affirm the trial court which held the railroad (L&N) is not entitled to indemnity from the…