Duquesne Steel Foundry Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The question involved in this tax case is: “Where the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has determined that the petitioner is not entitled to have its profits tax deduction specially fixed under the provisions of section 210 of the Revenue Act of 1917, and such determination has been affirmed by the Board of Tax Appeals, may it be reviewed by this court in the absence of fraud or other irregularity?”
In Cramer and King Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 41 F.(2d) 24, this same question was before this court, and it there held:
“Whether a taxpayer is entitled to a special assessment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cramer & King Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fort Pitt Bridge Works v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Dowd-Feder, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
- James F. Waters, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Heinemann Chemical Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- New Jersey Worsted Mills v. GnichtelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.