Legal Opinion

Amin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 2012No. A12A1401PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

Mahir Assad Amin appeals his conviction for possession of cathinone, a Schedule I substance, in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-25 (3) (GG). Amin contends, among other things, that the State did not present sufficient evidence of intent to find him guilty of the crime. For the reasons discussed below, we agree and reverse.

1. “When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence used to support a conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Duvall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Arroyo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Mohamed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kenneth Jerome Roundtree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API