Legal Opinion

In re Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Max Marcus Katz was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on October 20, 1971 and, at all times relevant to this proceeding, maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

This Court, in an order entered September 24, 2003, granted the Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s petition, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (d), Judiciary Law § 90 (2), and the doctrine of collateral estoppel, and found respondent had committed professional misconduct based upon adverse findings rendered in…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re DorfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re HawthorneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re RoggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re CaliguiriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re MolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re MusmannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API