In re Katz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Max Marcus Katz was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on October 20, 1971 and, at all times relevant to this proceeding, maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
This Court, in an order entered September 24, 2003, granted the Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s petition, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (d), Judiciary Law § 90 (2), and the doctrine of collateral estoppel, and found respondent had committed professional misconduct based upon adverse findings rendered in…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re DorfmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re HawthorneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4Cited by5 opinions
- In re RoggeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re CaliguiriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re MolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re MusmannoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re GarbariniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010