Legal Opinion

Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1954No. 13522PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action for an injunction, to restrain appellees from exhibiting motion pictures in connection with commercially sponsored or sustaining television broadcasts, where those motion pictures contain appearances of appellant. In its opinion below, 104 F.Supp. 918, the District Court gave judgment to appellees, holding that the contracts between appellees and appellant placed no restrictions upon appellees’ use or exhibition of the motion pictures. There were five contracts executed over a period of a dozen years, but the contracts are sufficiently similar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Republic Pictures Corp. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Terry Gilliam, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Rooney v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Landon v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API