Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Westfall

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 3, 1991No. 72022Published

1DissentBlackmar, Chief Justice

We should proceed very carefully when we are asked to censor or to censure political speech. Words spoken about an opinion by a judge who is subject to the periodic scrutiny of the voters, by an elected prosecuting attorney and potential candi*840date, relating to an important criminal matter, epitomize political expression.

The words were spoken during an interview with a television reporter. These reporters fire streams of questions, using the responses they deem most newsworthy. These are often the most vivid.1 Such give and take is a part of the political process, and should not be discouraged…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API