Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1978No. 59757, (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, C.J.

(to affirm). Defendant employed plaintiff as an elevator mechanic from 1967 until December of 1974, when plaintiff was transferred from the maintenance section to the service section because, according to plaintiff’s complaint, "defendant company wanted to make room for younger men with less seniority”. Defendant admitted the transfer but denied the reason ascribed.

On December 6, 1974, plaintiff was informed that there was no work, and laid off, although the complaint states that he continued to work a few days each month following the layoff.

Plaintiff filed a charge of age discrimination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hernden v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Holmes v. Haughton Elevator Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Smith v. Department of Public HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matras v. Amoco Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Schipani v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API