Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Bancsi

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 95-377PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-102(A) and (B)(3), and 2-110(A)(2). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1998