Legal Opinion
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Bancsi
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1995No. 95-377PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 9-102(A) and (B)(3), and 2-110(A)(2). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 1998