Legal Opinion

Mathers v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1933Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

(29 P. (2d) 516)

BAILEY, J.

Counsel for appellant has filed a printed document designated as “Motion for Rehearing and Argument Supporting the Same”, in which it is stated that the appellant “moves the court to grant a rehearing * * * and in support of said motion respectfully submits to the court the following reasons”, followed by a general argument concerning the law relative to conditional sales contracts, especially with reference to the rights of the vendor when the vendee has failed to comply with the time essence provision of the contract. A brief in support of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mathers v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API