Legal Opinion

Baldasar v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 16, 1980No. 77-6219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

446 U.S. 222 (1980)

BALDASAR

v.

ILLINOIS.

No. 77-6219.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 26, 1979.

Decided April 22, 1980.

CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT.

Michael Mulder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Mary Robinson, Ralph Ruebner, and Peter Nolte.

Michael B. Weinstein, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Scott, Attorney General, and Donald B. Mackay and Melbourne A. Noel, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General.[*]

2Per curiam

In Scott v. Illinois, 440 U. S. 367 (1979), the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Stewart; Concurrence · Marshall; Concurrence · Blackmun; Dissent.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Michael Bryant, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API