Legal Opinion

Cadle Co. v. Patoine

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 13, 2001No. 00-209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Amestoy, CJ.

Defendant Barbara Patoine, a co-signer on a defaulted promissory note purchased by plaintiff Cadle Company from the' Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), appeals the superior court’s summary judgment ruling refusing to apply any of her asserted defenses against plaintiff. We reverse.

In August 1991, Wayne Kimball obtained a $40,000 construction loan from Caledonia National Bank. Defendant co-signed the loan as an accommodation maker and thus was equally liable for its payment upon default. See 9A V.S.A. § 3-419(b); Federal Fin. Co. v. Landers, 169 Vt. 570, 571, 740 A.2d…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John W. NewhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. DeglauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. First Heights Bank, FSB v. Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Marian G. LeachCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schettler v. RALRON CAPITAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API