Stout v. Duncan
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The appellees brought this suit against the appellants and Daniel J. Stout and the sheriff of Monroe county. During the progress of the cause the sheriff and Stout disclaimed.
The plaintiffs had bought land of William K. Rawlings at *384an execution sale, and had a certificate of sale; they had demanded a deed, which the sheriff refused to give, because Stout and Rawlings and Buskirk had paid into the clerk’s office the amount of money necessary to redeem the land from the sale, and claimed that such payment was a valid redemption. Rawlings also claimed to have paid off for said…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Richardson v. HowkIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Burnside v. EnnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Zimmerman v. MarchlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boyle v. Anderson Fire Fighters Ass'n Local 1262Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Custer v. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.