M.G. v. V.P.

Pyle, Judge.

Statement of the Case

This case is a prime example of forum shopping for a protective order and the importance of respecting the doctrine of res judicata. M.G., who had a protective *261order against Y.P., appeals the trial court’s order granting V.P.’s third petition for a protective order against M.G. M.G. argues that the trial court should have denied V.P.’s third protective order petition based on the doctrine of res judicata because the third petition contained no new allegations from V.P.’s first and second protective order petitions that had been denied by-judges sitting in two…