Smith v. Transit Casualty Company
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Chief Judge.
The above entitled matter having come on for consideration and the Court having considered the claims of the parties, and after hearing evidence in connection with the Stowers doctrine controversy, and having carefully considered the evidence and having been fully advised in the premises, makes certain findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows.
This case involves what is commonly known in Texas as the “Stowers Doctrine”. In short, the Plaintiffs seek to recover damages against the Defendant on the grounds that the Defendant failed to exercise ordinary care…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
- Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Baucum v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Federation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Seguros Tepeyac, S. A., Compania Mexicana De Seguros Generales v. James L. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Ganaway v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.