Legal Opinion

North River Barge Line, Inc. v. Grace Line, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 13, 1947No. A 148-383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

Libellant excepts to interrogatories addressed to it by respondent numbered 3, 4, S, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, IS, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 on the ground that the information called for in said interrogatories is incompetent, immaterial and irrelevant and not the proper subject matter of inquiry.

*118, Libellant seeks to recover for damages to a scow chartered to respondent and alleges that the damage was occasioned by the fault, neglect and negligence of respondent.

This Court held in The Velox, D. C., 36 F.Supp. 929, 930, that "Admiralty Rule 31 [28 U.S.C.A. following section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. The VeloxDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Carpenter v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  3. Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API