Legal Opinion
Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Baum Bus Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 12, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taslbtojí, J. S. C.
Plaintiff Port Authority Trans-IIudson Corporation (PATH), defendants Baum Bus Company, Inc., at al. and third-party defendant City of Jersey City have moved for summary judgment. Defendants have also *588moved to stay further action in the case pending a final determination of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners (PUC) based upon a petition filed on September 16, 1975 and later amended on June 10, 1976.
PATH’S complaint alleges that it established a schedule of charges for the use of the Journal Square Transportation Center bus facility; that defendant bus companies have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Public Service Ry. Co. v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1921
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PoinsettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp. v. BAUM BUS. CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Trailways, Inc. v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- In re the Complaint Petition of Five Mile Beach Electric Railway Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001