Legal Opinion

Consolidated Fuel Co. v. Brooks

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1912No. 16,712PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Plaintiff and defendants are rival jobbers in coal, and both assert the exclusive right to use in the trade the name “Cristo Canon” to describe fuel mined by and purchased from the South Canon Coal Company at Big Four, Colo*422rado, where it is known as the “Carbon Canon Coal.” From a decree perpetually enjoining defendants from using the name in controversy for the purpose stated, they have appealed to this court.

The following propositions of law and fact are urged on behalf of defendants to defeat the injunction: Defendants invented the name. They were the first to register with the secretary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newman v. . AlvordNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Chadron Opera House Co. v. LoomerNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skinner Mfg. Co. v. General Foods Sales Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
  2. Northwest Ready Roofing Co. v. AntesNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API