Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Pfizer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 2006No. 06-0701-cvPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff pro se Charles M. Satterfield, III, appeals from a final judgment dismissing his pending fraud complaint against defendants Pfizer, Inc. and Wagner Harding Fischbein Badillo, denying his Rule 60(b) motion to vacate the judgment against him in Satterfield v. Monsanto, 88 F.Supp.2d 288 (S.D.N.Y.2000), aff'd 238 F.3d 217 (per curiam), and enjoining him from filing any new action based on the acts complained of in this litigation. See Satterfeld v. Pfizer, 2005 WL 1765708 (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Thomas A. Gleason v. John Jandrucko, Richard Spota, and Village of North TarrytownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Walter N. Iwachiw v. New York State Department Of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Niles v. Wilshire Investment Group, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Corsini v. BloombergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Cruz v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Dunbar v. JepsenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Schlosser v. KwakDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.