State v. Cosentino
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellee was charged by information with the unlawful possession of marihuana, an offense described in the information as a felony. The appellee demurred to the information, on the ground that the asserted offense is only a misdemeanor under Article IV, § 1, of Act 590 of 1971, the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1971). This appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer.
The trial court correctly held the offense to be a misdemeanor, for the reasons stated in Bennett v. State, also decided today. 252 Ark. 128, 477 S.W. 2d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- State v. LangstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fight v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973