Legal Opinion

State v. Cosentino

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 13, 1972No. 5690PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellee was charged by information with the unlawful possession of marihuana, an offense described in the information as a felony. The appellee demurred to the information, on the ground that the asserted offense is only a misdemeanor under Article IV, § 1, of Act 590 of 1971, the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (Supp. 1971). This appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer.

The trial court correctly held the offense to be a misdemeanor, for the reasons stated in Bennett v. State, also decided today. 252 Ark. 128, 477 S.W. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. State v. LangstaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fight v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API