Legal Opinion

American Wild Horse Campaign v. Bureau of Land Management

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 17, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2022-2971Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2971 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant. AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-3027 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In these two consolidated cases, plaintiff American Wild Horse Campaign (“plaintiff”) challenges the adequacy of the search performed by defendant United States Bureau of Land Management (“defendant” or “BLM”) to locate, in…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  3. Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. The Nation Magazine, Washington Bureau, and Max Holland v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API