Legal Opinion

In Re Roth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1934No. Crim. 2615Published

1Opinion of the Court

3 Cal.App.2d 226 (1934)

In the Matter of the Application of IRWIN H. ROTH for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 2615.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

December 20, 1934.

Richard H. Cantillon for Petitioner.

Philbrick McCoy, W. E. Simpson, Everett W. Mattoon, S. V. O. Prichard, Buron Fitts, Tracy Chatfield Becker and A. H. Van Cott for Respondent.

Willis, J., pro tem.

The petitioner seeks his release under habeas corpus from two separate commitments for constructive contempt, issued on the same day after hearing of two consecutive contempt proceedings. The matter…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Swart v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Robertson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API