Legal Opinion

Davis v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 22, 1995No. Docket Nos. 24808-93, 24824-93UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

Held: D received dividends of $ 200,451 from certain intercorporate transfers of money. Held, further, D's sec. 1244, I.R.C. loss was $ 12,500.

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. DAVIS AND REBECCA DAVIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; AREDCO, INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Davis v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 24808-93, 24824-93

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1995-283; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 280; 69 T.C.M. (CCH) 3004;

June 22, 1995, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

Held: D received dividends of $ 200,451 from certain intercorporate transfers of money. Held, further, D's sec. 1244, I.R.C. loss was $ 12,500.

For petitioners: Peter C. Guild and Max K. Boyer.

For respondent: Katherine Holmes…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Fin Hay Realty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  3. Estate of Travis Mixon, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Rushing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  5. W. B. Rushing v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hubert Enters. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005
  2. Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, Dynamo, GP, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018
  3. Hubert Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2005
  4. Hubert Enters. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API