Legal Opinion

Getty v. First National Bank

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided July 24, 1933No. 48Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrand, P. J.,

In an action of replevin the defendant moved to quash the writ. A rule having been issued upon this motion, the plaintiff presented her motion to strike off the motion to quash, together with the rule issued thereon. Both motions have since been argued before the court in banc.

The motion to quash avers that this court is without jurisdiction in the case, for the reason that the defendant bank is a National bank and that said bank has been, since March 20, 1933, in the hands of C. B. Cloak, conservator, he being duly commissioned by the Government of the United States of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Corn Exchange Bk. of Chicago v. . BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API