Legal Opinion
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 13, 1970No. 142-67, 95-68PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR RECONSIDERATION
2Per curiam
Defendant has asked us to reconsider part of our holding in this case. 427 F.2d 727, 192 Ct.Cl.- (June 12, 1970). 1 The objection is to the conclusion, in our original opinion, that, when new bonds are issued for old stocks, debt discount is available where the amount originally paid for the old stocks is less than the maturity value of the new debt securities for which they are exchanged. We applied that rule to the publicly held common stock of New Orleans, Texas & Mexico Railway Company, and remanded the case to the trial commissioner…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Lackawanna Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Cities Service Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1955
- State of Texas v. Group of Institutional Investors Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Group of Institutional InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cities Service Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.