Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Grady
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 9, 2020No. 7:20-cv-00645Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK “MIGUEL DIAZ, Plaintiff, -against- 20-CV-0645 (CS) WILLIAM GRADY, Dutchess County ORDER TO AMEND District Attorney Office, Defendant. CATHY SEIBEL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Attica Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Defendant, the District Attorney (“DA”) of Dutchess County, violated his rights. By order dated February 18, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis.' For the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.