Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Baker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The first question presented is whether paragraph 1 of the complaint, setting forth the first cause of action, sufficiently alleges a contract between appellant and respondent, whereby respondent was to assume managerial duties in the cafeteria and appellant personally was to pay her salary. For the purposes of this assignment, we do not deem it necessary to discuss, consider, or express any opinion, (1) upon the question whether the fact that in a verified complaint the allegations in one count or paragraph are in point of fact inconsistent with those in another paragraph, renders the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaehler v. DobberpuhlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. American Wrecking Co. v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Graff v. TinkhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. Allen-Hough Carryola Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ad. Dernehl & Sons Co. v. DetertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Miller v. Welworth TheatresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Sullivan v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rehse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API